I've seen loads of questions in the past from new members asking which is better between the ProQ E20 & the WSM.
Now i own and use both cookers at home and in competition and when i was at The Big Feastival I was talking to Adie about my thoughts on both cookers and what i thought the difference between them and he suggested I post it on here to share with all you guys.
I use both cookers with clay saucer and I just want to point out that this is my experience and I’m not saying this is a definitive answer on the matter but someone’s view who’s got a bit of experience with them both.
The WSM works well but I find that it runs hot. With the WSM using clay, the lowest I can get it set is 250f but then it also has a tendency of rising quickly and it can take a while to get the temp’s stable and even long overnight cooks that it will have been quite happy sitting at 250f for a few hours it will run up and within seconds it’s up at 290f+ and then I’ve got to work on getting the temp’s back down by closing it off and the once it’s cooled, open the vent again to reset the temp’.
The ProQ is easy to get up to temp’ and with the clay saucer any time I open or close the vents it responds instantly. It’ll hold temp’ for hours. On overnight cooks the temps will drop after a while but I prefer this as it’s only a quick twist of the dial and then back to sleep.
In summary for any newbies looking to get started there is very little in it. My preference is the ProQ as I believe it’s a bit more forgiving and you’ll be able to get great results from it. I know a lot of people talk about the WSM being more fuel efficient which it is, but when slow smoking a brisket I would rather use a cooker that won’t over shoot my target temp’.